contact luis

luis is a co-founder and social software architect at SyndeoLabs, and a director at Exist Global. he likes building small web toys a whole lot. More ...

quick links to the good stuff

  • 25 First Dates 25 May 2009
  • True Crime: Confessions of a Criminal Mastermind 17 Feb 2009
  • Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis 27 Jan 2009
  • Sex and Schrodinger's Cat 07 January 2009
  • An Extended Rant on Heroes 26 September 2008
  • Zero Barrier 05 May 2008
  • Sweatshop Blogging Economics 08 April 2008
  • The Doomsday Singularity 25 February 2008
  • Piracy and Its Impact on Philippine Music 21 January 2008
  • The Manila Pen-etration by the Hotelier Antonio Trillanes 29 November 2007
  • Journey of a Thousand Heroes 17 December 2006
  • Shake, Rattle & LOL 30 December 2005

@helloluis on Twitter

    elsewhere online

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Last.FM
    • Del.icio.us
    • Flickr
    • Plurk
    • Multiply
    • Stumbleupon

    guttervomit

    • 41

      Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis

      27 Jan 2009

      I’ve been thinking recently about soul mates and the chances of finding that soul mate. Why have I been thinking about this? Because I drink too much every night and wake up every morning with a dry throat and a dull headache, and thus cannot bring myself to start working until after several hours of staring blankly into space. But I digress. This piece is an attempt at quantifying the odds of finding that special somone, and contains some thoughts regarding how to increase those odds further.

      Now, the first step is of course believing that your soul mate exists. I know a lot of people don’t believe that everyone has a soul mate, but for the purposes of this article, let’s just ignore them.

      The tricky thing about this whole discussion is that the cosmos never bothered to lay down any ground rules regarding soul mates, so we’re unfortunately stuck making a bunch of assumptions. Here are the ones that I’m basing my calculations on:

      1. Your soul mate exists, and is currently alive somewhere in the world. I’m not going to waste time calculating the odds of meeting a soul mate who was alive B.C., or will be born around the time the flying car goes mainstream. We’re going to assume that the cosmos was considerate enough to give you a fighting chance after all.

      2. Your soul mate is of the preferred sexual orientation. This whole discussion would be pointless otherwise.

      3. Your soul mate speaks at least one of the languages that you do. Again, it would be otherwise impossible to connect with your soul mate if you can’t speak a common language.

      (Nota Bene: If you disagree with any of the items above, tough luck. I’m not doing your math for you.)

      Given those three assumptions, you can compute the maximum number of potential soul mate candidates simply by multiplying the population of your chosen language by the percentage of your preferred sexual orientation. Let’s call this your Personal Soul Mate Index.

      For example, my chosen language is English (1.5 billion native and non-native speakers) and my preferred sexual orientation is straight female. The global gender ratio is about 51:49 in favor of men, so I multiply 1.5 billion by 0.49, which would be roughly 735,000,000. I would then reduce that number further by 2% to get my PSMI (which is the alleged gay ratio), leaving me with 720,300,000 straight English-speaking females. If you were a gay male, you would multiply 1.5 billion by 0.51 and then again by 0.02, giving you a much smaller PSMI, at only 15.3 million.

      (Note that you could also choose to totally ignore the language part of the equation and simply multiply your sexual orientation by the total global population, which is at 6.7 billion at the time of this writing.)

      I’ll give you a moment to compute your own PSMIs.

      All good? Great, let’s move on to the fun stuff.

      So, the likelihood of me meeting my soulmate is roughly 1 in 720,000,000, and what we’re going to do over the next few paragraphs is work out just how “likely” that is. I’m a 27-year-old Filipino, and have a life expectancy of 71 years. That means I’ve got a potential for 44 more years of searching for that darned soul mate of mine. Let’s be more granular, and calculate how many days that is:

      (365 days * 33 common years) + (366 days * 11 leap years) = 16,071 days to go

      Let’s tack on the past 9 years of my life as well, or since I turned 18, i.e., legally capable of having sex with my soul mate should I meet her. (And if that sounds a little crass, I apologize. I’m sure you would simply lose yourself in your soul mate’s eyes forever.)

      16071 + ((365 * 7) + (366 * 2)) = 19,358 days in total

      We can express all of this very simply by saying that if I want to meet my soul mate and I am unlucky enough to have had to meet every single person in my entire PSMI before I finally meet her, I would have to see 720,300,000 people over 19,358 days starting when I turned 18. (37,209 people per day, or about half of the people who went to the Eraserheads concert last year.)

      Does that sound discouraging? Let’s do some quick math to work out the problem.

      I’m sitting at a Starbucks as I write this, and there are easily 30 other people in and around this place with me. I’ll walk back to the office and there are another 60 people there. Later tonight I’ll have dinner at the Fort, and will come into indirect contact with about 100 or so different people. If I were commuting, I’d get on to a train car with 50 other people all mashed up against each other.

      Depending on how much you move around, you come in to indirect contact with about 150-200 unique people every day. Possibly even more than that if you really pound the pavement. That means that without drastically changing my lifestyle, I will see about 3,871,600 people over the course of my life or about 0.5% of my PSMI. Expressed in more practical terms, my chances of finding my soul mate at any point in my post-18 life is about 1 in 200. If you play Texas Hold ‘Em, this is roughly the same odds as being dealt pocket aces (220:1). (Interestingly enough, I’ve been dealt pocket aces about half a dozen times at Hold ‘Em that I can remember.)

      Is that depressing? Yeah, a little bit. 20 years ago, that would be pretty much all she wrote too. But these days we’re fortunate enough to have a way to connect with thousands more at any given moment, i.e., the internets. I’ve got about 670 people following me on Twitter, about 250 friends on Facebook and have built a handful of little web toys that thousands of people use every day. Your own numbers will be drastically different of course, but the point is that we’re able to cheat the odds by making ourselves really visible online. In fact, if I assume that my soul mate is a straight female who speaks English and has Internet access, my PSMI is reduced even further. There are 1.4 billion people on the Internet, 430.8 million of which speak English, and 206.8 million of which are probably straight females. Now my chances are about 58:1, which in Hold ‘Em terms is roughly the odds that you would get a pair of aces, kings, queens or jacks in your pocket (54.3:1). If all that sounds a little fanciful, it’s really not. I mean seriously, what kind of cosmos would give me a soul mate that didn’t use the Internet? That would just be cruel. (Or for that matter, didn’t subscribe to poker hand probabilities.)

      One way to look at the 58:1 ratio is thusly: if I had 58 times to relive my life, I would cross paths with my soul mate once. That sounds incredibly sad, so here’s another way to look at it: if you took 58 other guys with similar soul-mate indices as me, only one of us would find our soul mate. I like the sound of that a little bit more, but I’m not entirely sure it’s the right way to look at the numbers. Anyway.

      The trick here really is to make yourself as visible as possible online so as to reach as many people as possible. Joining social networks and generating online content is the new-school equivalent of taking yoga classes or joining photography clubs in order to meet new people, and it’s a lot more cost-effective too. The idea of course is not to stop looking. Just because the odds seem stacked against you, doesn’t mean it isn’t possible. After all, according to the Drake equation, the number of other currently-existing civilizations in our entire galaxy could be as little as 2, and yet we still train our telescopes at the sky every night, waiting.

      41 Responses to “Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis”

      1. Claire Says:
        January 27th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

        Bottom line is… Don’t take life seriously. Finding one’s soul mate is the least of our worries. But this mathematical approach cuts out the guesswork from the mystical kismet and romantic destiny churva.

      2. luis Says:
        January 27th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

        Claire:

        Hehe, I’m not sure if “don’t take life seriously” is the advice I would give to a lot of people. There’s a happy medium between taking stuff too seriously and just being completely detached about everything, I think. Ideally, we’d give things just enough thought to ensure that we’re not acting like idiots, but not so much thought that we’d end up acting like existential idiots.

      3. Jon Limjap Says:
        January 27th, 2009 at 8:32 pm

        LOL. The concept of a soulmate is so ethereal and non-deterministic that I am kinda amused you went so far as to trying to calculate it. :P

      4. Luna Says:
        January 27th, 2009 at 9:52 pm

        I always tell people, “It’s fucking rare to like someone, who will like you, at the exact same time.” Thanks for providing the math ;)

      5. lemon Says:
        January 27th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

        Will the formula change at all if you take into account that your soulmate is supposed to be looking for you as well?

      6. heidelicious Says:
        January 28th, 2009 at 1:17 am

        i’ve always believed that numbers are the primary source of inevitable worries in our daily lives..as in time, money, taxes, metered taxi fare, calories, waist line, hits, unique visitors, etc. that’s why i’ve always been thankful, too, that there are no numbers involved in love (or finding your soul mate, for that matter)..

        and then there’s your very interesting formula! :-)

      7. j4s0n Says:
        January 28th, 2009 at 7:31 am

        Wow, that sounds like the “Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon”!

      8. luis Says:
        January 28th, 2009 at 10:57 am

        “Will the formula change at all if you take into account that your soulmate is supposed to be looking for you as well?”

        I verified this with some friends who have allegedly stronger math skills than me, and the answer was no. The reason was that even if you are eliminating candidates at the same time, neither of you are aware of which candidates the other has eliminated. If there were a way to inform your soul mate which people you had already met and rejected, then yes, there would be an effect. On the other hand, if you had the ability to inform them of your activities then this whole calculation would be pointless wouldn’t it? :P

      9. kangel Says:
        January 30th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

        You’re unbelievable. You spend that time to think of that formula.. :) You’re one heck o math genius.

        I also believe that there is the one (uhm soulmate). I’m also looking for him. But everybody can be a candidate. Just know what you want and believe you will have it.

        Nice article :)

      10. Krupskaya Anonuevo Says:
        January 31st, 2009 at 12:28 am

        Hi Luis! K(rupskaya Anonuevo) here (UPIS, batch ‘97). I was just with Therese an hour ago and (of course, haha) your name was mentioned at some point.

        So, with Therese’s track-him-down prodding, I google you.

        And I find your piece on finding one’s soulmate.

        Have you read Alain de Botton’s Essays in Love? It begins with the main character’s computation of the probability of him meeting Chloe, this girl he falls in love with. The improbability of it all leads him to conclude that meeting Chloe was a preordained thing.

        Not a big fan of the concept of destiny (&soulmates, for that matter), but the novel has cool diagrams and fun references.

        My point? That there are usually diamonds amidst soulmate drivel.

        I like how you highlighted how the www increases connections/interactions, thus increasing the probability of finding someone like-minded and sexy :).

        K

        P.S. Why the website name?

      11. Luis Says:
        January 31st, 2009 at 5:04 pm

        Hi K! I’m not even gonna ask exactly how my name came up in that conversation :P thankfully I’m easy enough to find online (I have to take my own advice after all). Thanks for the book reco, I’ll get around to that after I finish off these economics books currently crowding my desk.

      12. Mia Says:
        February 1st, 2009 at 9:07 pm

        Haha, I love this post! It would be fun to think of ways to refine the model, too.

        As for myself… I will either a) hope that my soulmate is very, very good at tracking people down (not very unlikely, considering who I am and thus what kind of person my soulmate would probably be) or b) not bother hoping and just distract myself by writing about straight men who can talk about physics, literature, and art with equal ease.

        Or c) — disbelieve in the concept, but where’s the fun in that?

      13. luis Says:
        February 2nd, 2009 at 2:18 pm

        “c) — disbelieve in the concept, but where’s the fun in that?”

        Yeah, exactly :) As long as you don’t hold your breath waiting for that One Magic Moment where you and your soul mate cross paths, the theory itself is lots of fun to think about.

      14. guttervomit | a collection of stuff by luis buenaventura » On Being Lone.ly Says:
        April 7th, 2009 at 10:45 am

        [...] Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis 27 Jan 2009 [...]

      15. BetmoPoker Blog Says:
        May 18th, 2009 at 2:50 am

        Thanks for a great blog! Checkout my blog if you like. I log all my Poker Session there, give some feedback if you want/can. Keep up the blogging!

      16. Vikki Says:
        July 8th, 2009 at 1:03 am

        First off, I enjoyed reading this because I love numbers. :) Second, I think instead of counting your chances of meeting your soulmate, you should focus on the encounters that has the most impact to you (example is your tweet about meeting someone with a single fang like you). That’s all. Great piece. :)

      17. Super-b Says:
        July 9th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

        Wow, just diggin some old posts and i’m stuck on this one. maybe someone should make a soulmate calculator or soulmate finder using any big social network. there should be enough fields on the questionnaire so the search can return nearly accurate results… or keywords on a likes and dislikes manner, with some words already on database and a blank field to add more keywords…

        should be cool!

      18. luis Says:
        July 11th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

        Vikki, glad you enjoyed it! I think I do both, life is more fun when you look at both the big picture and the little details with equal attention.

        Super-b, we’re actually working on something kinda like that right now :)

      19. Finalists: Top Ten Posts of the Year « The 2009 Philippine Blog Awards Says:
        October 4th, 2009 at 11:50 am

        [...] guttervomit – Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis [...]

      20. Updated:Finalists: Top Ten Posts of the Year « The 2009 Philippine Blog Awards Says:
        October 5th, 2009 at 8:04 am

        [...] guttervomit – Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis [...]

      21. tonyocruz.com » Winners of the Philippine Blog Awards 2009 Says:
        October 11th, 2009 at 11:29 am

        [...] Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis (guttervomit) [...]

      22. 2009 Philippine Blog Awards Winners Says:
        October 11th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

        [...] Best Posts of the Year Karnabal by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! [...]

      23. 2009 Philippine Blog Awards | ederic@cyberspace Says:
        October 11th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      24. Thank You (Updated) « The Marocharim Experiment Says:
        October 11th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      25. Noel Perlas – Perlas Design Studio » Blog Archive » Congratulations Philippine Blog Award Winners Says:
        October 12th, 2009 at 2:30 am

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! [...]

      26. Thanks for Choosing Micamyx! Says:
        October 12th, 2009 at 5:06 am

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      27. Winners of the 2009 Philippine Blog Awards | WordPress Philippines Says:
        October 12th, 2009 at 9:40 am

        [...] Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis (guttervomit) [...]

      28. Alleba Blog » 2009 Philippine Blog Awards Winners Says:
        October 12th, 2009 at 10:19 am

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! [...]

      29. I Won? (2009 Philippine Blog Awards) | Just Jeric | personal blog Says:
        October 12th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      30. The Daily PCIJ » Blog Archive » Best blogs honored at PBA 2009 Says:
        October 12th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      31. Let’s Go Sago! Bags GeiserMaclang Transformative Influencer Award; Nokia E75 :) Says:
        October 13th, 2009 at 12:01 am

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      32. 2009 Philippine Blog Awards Aftermath: The Bitter Ocampo Edition – Noisy Noisy Man | pinoy funny website, blog, jokes, comedy, humor, reviews | your daily dose of retard Says:
        October 13th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

        [...] Filipiniana Blog – Pilipino Komiks 10 Best Posts of the Year Karnabal by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      33. Phil. Blog Awards 09: I won… | The BLIPS Network Says:
        October 13th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! [...]

      34. Winners of the 2009 Philippine Blog Awards Says:
        October 13th, 2009 at 4:31 pm

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      35. BED Podcast winner at the 2009 Philippine Blog Awards | Brink Notes Entertainment Daily Says:
        October 14th, 2009 at 10:03 am

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      36. Philippine Blog Awards 2009 Video Highlights  | BUDDY GANCENIA : Producer – Videographer Says:
        October 16th, 2009 at 6:51 pm

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      37. The Philippine Blog Awards 2009 | Social Media Philippines Says:
        October 18th, 2009 at 8:14 am

        [...] by Tuyong Tinta ng Bolpen Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis by Guttervomit Lost Gems Of Philippine History: The 1896 Board Meeting by It’s true! It’s true! [...]

      38. kae Says:
        October 22nd, 2009 at 5:15 am

        maybe it is me… =p

      39. Marlowe Says:
        October 25th, 2009 at 10:04 pm

        Congratulation on your Best Post of the Year award! I must agree that this post is well written, well researched, and well computed. But for the sake of an argument, if you really believe in Soul Mate, don’t you think the ratio should actually be 1:1? If you’re soulmates, that means your destined to be with each other. You don’t even need to analyze the odds of meeting her/him. The real factor is not IF but WHEN? Anyway, I’m just glad I had found mine! Watch out for my blog Proud To Be Pinoy on next year’s Philippine Blog Awards… lol.

      40. pinoyatheart Says:
        December 27th, 2009 at 4:55 am

        I read half of your post. From a mathematical standpoint, you failed to calculate your financial status into the equation. This is a major flaw in your equation. Having visited the Philppines many times, I’ve discovered that one’s level of wealth is directly proportionate to finding a soul mate there. lol. I’m middle-aged, but well educated and very moral–and well-off financially…and many, many young and attractive Filipinas have proclaimed to me that they were my soul-mates on my business trips there. :0)

      41. ija Says:
        February 3rd, 2010 at 7:32 am

        man im already a fan. great article by the way. i agree with us being in that fine line of being not an idiot and being not an existential idiot.

      Leave a Reply

     

    categories

    • Home
    • Business (103)
      • Acquisitions (15)
      • Goin' Legit (61)
    • Media (323)
      • Artwork (12)
      • Books (21)
      • Comics (8)
      • Movies (140)
      • Music (102)
      • Photography (31)
      • Poker (10)
      • TV (29)
    • Randomness (299)
    • Site News (8)
    • Technology (273)
      • Games (13)
      • Hardware (111)
      • Social Software (45)
      • Software (131)
    • Tutorials (16)

    archives

    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • July 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
    • December 2001
    • November 2001
    • October 2001

    friends

    • Dementia
    • Gabby
    • Gail
    • Gibbs
    • Helga
    • Ia
    • Ina
    • Jason
    • Kaye
    • Lauren
    • Lizz
    • Luna
    • Mae
    • Migs
    • Mike
    • Ryan
    • Sacha
    • Vicky
    • Vida
    • Yuga

    search

    notes

    Guttervomit v3 went online in January, 2008. It uses Wordpress for publishing, and was built largely with Adobe Illustrator and Textmate. Logotype and navigation is set with Interstate.