luis is a co-founder and social software architect at SyndeoLabs, and a director at Exist Global. he likes building small web toys a whole lot. More ...

quick links to the good stuff

  • 25 First Dates 25 May 2009
  • True Crime: Confessions of a Criminal Mastermind 17 Feb 2009
  • Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis 27 Jan 2009
  • Sex and Schrodinger's Cat 07 January 2009
  • An Extended Rant on Heroes 26 September 2008
  • Zero Barrier 05 May 2008
  • Sweatshop Blogging Economics 08 April 2008
  • The Doomsday Singularity 25 February 2008
  • Piracy and Its Impact on Philippine Music 21 January 2008
  • The Manila Pen-etration by the Hotelier Antonio Trillanes 29 November 2007
  • Journey of a Thousand Heroes 17 December 2006
  • Shake, Rattle & LOL 30 December 2005

    elsewhere online

    • Last.FM
    • Del.icio.us
    • Flickr
    • Plurk
    • Multiply
    • Stumbleupon

    guttervomit

    • 6

      Why Do People Vote?

      29 Oct 2007

      It’s Barangay Elections day today, and once again I am staying home feeling rather proud of myself for not participating in the democratic process. A lot of my friends don’t vote as well, either because they’re too busy, too lazy or too jaded. In that sense, I suppose you could say that I’m the uber-non-voter — I’m too busy/lazy/jaded AND I actually have a rational reason for not voting.

      To illustrate, let me recount the generic conversation I often have with people who ask me why I don’t vote:

      =======

      RANDOM PERSON: So you don’t vote. Why not?

      ME: Because I know that my vote doesn’t matter.

      RANDOM PERSON: What do you mean it doesn’t matter? Of course it matters. What if your vote happened to be the one to decide between two candidates?

      ME: That’s a statistical impossibility, and you know it. No voting margin has ever come down to within one vote. Even the "extremely-close" race between Bush and Gore in 2000 came down to a "razor-thin" lead of half-a-million votes. There’s a pretty big difference between half-a-million votes and one.

      RANDOM PERSON: Well, if everybody thought like you then no one would vote!

      ME: That’s a statistical impossibility as well, and the chances of no one else voting are probably around the same as the chances of a single vote deciding the outcome of the whole process. The fact of the matter is, other people do vote.

      RANDOM PERSON: So you just have no sense of social responsibility.

      ME: And now you’re turning this into a personal attack. Let me clarify some of the points: a single vote (in this case, mine) doesn’t matter. If it did matter (i.e., if it were in fact "the deciding vote"), then we should revise our voting process so that next time everyone should just stay home and a random person should be selected to cast a single vote, which will then decide which candidate wins. It’d be a lot cheaper to run, and it would be very difficult to cheat. Also, I think that the voting process is broken because it allows multiple choices; in the end, the winner isn’t the one who was chosen by the majority, but the one who garnered the most votes. (The "majority" would be defined as over 50% of the voting population. However, consider the scenario of 3 candidates. Each of them receives 33%, 33% and 34% of the votes respectively. The winner has not received the "majority" of the votes; he’s simply received more votes than his opponents. In this scenario, 66% of the population are unhappy with the eventual outcome of the race, and only 34% are. So much for "the rule of the masses.")

      RANDOM PERSON: So what does that have to do with social responsibility?

      ME: Well, in a very real sense, I consider voting to be a waste of time. And not because I think that our politicians are corrupt (they are), or that the government is a flawed organization (it is), but because I would be participating in an ineffective system, wherein my contribution would itself be ineffective. There’s nothing in the social-contract that says that I should consume what limited time I have engaging in futile exercises, so I don’t consider this to be socially irresponsible.

      RANDOM PERSON: I don’t think you’re a very nice guy.

      =======

      * Note: Some of these ideas came from Andre Weil, the great mathematician, by way of , the economist.

      * Note#2: This piece is a repost from a few days back. My server fell down and I lost a handful of my most recent entries. Fortunately (or actually, strangely), I managed to back this essay up.

      Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments »

    • 4

      Quezon City Blogged

      23 Oct 2007

      Spotted an interesting blog today via stellify, which focuses rather exclusively on Quezon City, and its cornucopia of hangouts, events and hidden locales.

      I’ve lived in Q.C. since I was about 4 years old so I’m intimately familiar with all of the locations the blog talks about, and skimming through its entries this morning, I was oddly sentimental. That said, Quezon City is the largest city in Luzon in terms of land area, and the blog’s coverage is predominantly only of the southern half (Diliman, Congressional, Libis, Timog, etc.) and says little about the areas farther up north (Commonwealth, or Novaliches, for example). It’s a pretty big job when you stop to consider how much activity there actually is amongst QC’s 160 or so sq. kilometers, or how few people will really ever go out of their way to visit every available nook and cranny.

      It’d be great someone could pull something like this off for Makati; I still have a hard time deciding where to go for drinks every night coz I don’t know where anything is.

      Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

    • 4

      Heroes, Dexter and All-Star Superman

      21 Oct 2007

      Heroes Season 2, Episodes 1-4

      Tim Kring’s serial superhero drama made a triumphant return to television a little over a month ago, and it’s so far been a rough four weeks for our intrepid band of evolutionaries.

      Peter is, of course, alive and well, and not surprisingly, so is Sylar. Claire and her family are in hiding, as are the 3M’s (Matt, Mohinder and Molly). Hiro is off adventuring in medieval Japan, and we spend a lot of screen time tracking the progress of Maya and Alejandro – the life & death twins – as they attempt to cross the border to the States, and leaving a rather blatant trail of hemorrhaged corpses in their wake. (God forbid these two twins ever learn how to use a phone to at least figure out if Dr. Suresh even wants to see them first.)

      What surprises me most about Season 2 is how similar the general plot is to Season 1. Peter is once again exhibiting powers that he doesn’t fully understand (owing to some convenient memory loss), Claire is once again smirking her way through high school, Matt is back on the force, and in episode 4, we are introduced to yet another pancake waitress with an exceptional learning ability. I swear to God, it’s 2006 all over again, with a bigger budget.

      A couple of things are of course significantly different as well: Claire no longer being a cheerleader is the biggest surprise, although in exchange we are made to suffer through the most stomach-churning high school romance subplot I’ve ever seen on mainstream TV. More than Hayden Panettiere’s celebutante-esque acting style, is the fact that the dude they chose to play flyboy West looks and acts like a third-rate Zac Efron. As before, Claire’s high-school scenes are enough to drive viewers to mass suicides—one would think that Kring and company had learned to avoid that by now.

      On a more positive note, the embittered Nathan is a pleasure to watch, and the unfolding mystery behind Molly-the-human-Google’s nightmares is certainly interesting. I guess what I find most surprising is how much time it’s taken Season 2 to really get rolling—only Episode 4 has so far shown any real life post-explosion, and even then we have to sit through almost 15 minutes of a thoroughly sickening romance between flyboy and indestructigirl. (Almost makes me wish we had more scenes of Niki and Micah, however inconsequential those usually end up being.)

      All-Star Superman, Issues 1-8

      This Eisner-Award-winning new series has restored my interest in Superman, although I’ll admit that it had a lot to do with the creative team of Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely, who I believe are two of the very best currently working in the industry. “All-Star” is both an homage and an innovation of classic Superman, a truly creative cross between the groundbreaking revisionism of Alan Moore’s legendary run on Supreme, and the sci-fi-driven insanity of Ellis and Millar’s work on The Authority. Because it’s a bi-monthly series, it’s still only at issue #8, although it debuted back in November of 2005. Sadly, both Morrison and Quitely have stated that they’ll be leaving after issue #12, but that just means I’ve got 4 issues of wonderfully entertaining Superman comics to go.

      Dexter Season 2, Episodes 1-3

      Unlike Heroes, HBO’s fantastically clever serial-killer drama starts off with multiple bangs. Dexter’s positively Biblical murder of his brother in Season 1 has left our hero in a bit of a funk; he hasn’t had a successful kill in over a month. As if that weren’t enough, his underwater dumping grounds for his past victims has just been uncovered by the Miami police. Now there’s a superstar FBI agent in town and a task force looking for the “Bay Harbor Butcher,” and just to add a little extra salt on the wound, Rita has finally figured out the “truth” behind Paul’s missing shoe. Michael C. Hall’s stoic delivery is great fun as always, and the fact that everybody around him is kooky with a passion makes this show wonderfully entertaining to watch.

      Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

    • 3

      Movie Posters: 27 Dresses vs. The Illusionist

      18 Oct 2007

      My recent fascination with movie posters resulted in this rather interesting discovery today, while viewing the poster for the upcoming Katherine Heigl romantic comedy "27 Dresses." Cute concept, but isn’t that a direct ripoff of The Illusionist’s poster from last year?

      twenty_seven_dresses poster 4

      Check out my small collection of random movie posters here. I’m working on adding some commentary to all of them, but I’ve got over a hundred now so it’s bit of a job.

      Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

    • 0

      On Radiohead’s “In Rainbows”

      14 Oct 2007

      So after listening to nothing but "In Rainbows" for the past 48 hours (I downloaded the album last Friday), I think I’ve had sufficient time to digest Radiohead’s long-awaited 7th album. I’ve been a fan since a little after The Bends was released, although honestly, I didn’t really come to understand their music until I hit college and had sufficient experience with other bands to make adequate comparisons. It’s a bit early to be calling In Rainbows the "Alternative Rock Album of the Year," but it’s so far trounced everything I’ve listened to over the past 10 months. 

      I guess it’s a real testament to Radiohead’s genius then, that this is still only their 3rd or 4th best album. Why only 3rd or 4th? Well, you have to consider that The Bends (which would be my pick for best Radiohead album ever, and possibly best Alt Rock album of all-time), had such anthemic tracks as "Fake Plastic Trees," "Just" and "Street Spirit (Fade Out)", and Kid A featured genre-bending songs like "Idioteque" (my personal favorite), "How to Disappear Completely" and "Motion Picture Soundtrack." I would place In Rainbows somewhere alongside OK Computer, which would have been the 3rd album on that list. They are both equally tight and beautifully written, although obviously the older album was significantly more ground-breaking.

      What I love most about In Rainbows though, is how extravagantly passionate each song is ("All I Need" packs a hell of a wallop in its last 45 seconds, and "15 Step" and "Bodysnatchers" are electrical storms). Emotional without being emo, each song walks a fantastically thin line between restraint and overindulgence, and it’s a real joy listening to these masters at work.

      Check it out if you haven’t already. The whole album is available donationware-style at InRainbows.com.

      [ FAN TRIVIA: One of my favorite tracks on In Rainbows, "Weird Fishes/Arpeggi" is actually a remake of an older song called "Arpeggi," which was written back in 2005 specifically for the Ondes Martenot, a strange French keyboard from the 1920's that Jonny Greenwood had taken a liking to (and has since used frequently on many Radiohead tracks). A lot of the sounds we mistake for electronica in the last 3 albums comes from this contraption. Check out this Youtube video featuring . ]

       

      Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

    • 1

      On Shelfari, Last.fm and the Phenomenon of Social-Review

      13 Oct 2007

      I was musing today, about how quickly Shelfari has caught on with my bookworm friends. This little network launched in October 2006 and is a product of Taste Makers, Inc., a company that I’m assuming will quite soon be targeting areas like movies, music, food, and any other consumer products that people can be enthusiastic about. The shopping giant Amazon allegedly invested about a million into Shelfari earlier this year, and that’s a fairly good indication of how you would possibly make money from an idea like this.

      It’s interesting because this was roughly the idea I was operating under with gibbity, filmcrowd, and a third booklovers’ community site that I never got to properly sink my teeth into, back in 2005. The social media space is exquisitely deep if you know where to look and there’s so much online activity surrounding the Harry Potters and Da Vinci Codes of the world that it’s impossible to ignore. Of course, I had no idea how to properly make something like this work back then, so both attempts eventually just faded. That’s fine though, at least I know now that the idea itself was sound.

      My original strategy was to hit gamers (http://gibbity.com), movie lovers (http://filmcrowd.com) and then bookworms (never settled on a name, but was leaning towards http://bookcrowd.com), in that order. Gamers came first because there was only one other social-review competitor in the game space back then, and I was an ex-gamer who was seeing his game-time slowly being eroded by his work-hours. Movie lovers came next because I personally loved writing short reviews of films and comparing them against other people’s. At the time, Rotten Tomatoes was the only other place online where average people could do something like that in a structured fashion (of course there were movie blogs and forums, but there was no real way to see users’ contributions side-by-side).

      And I wanted to target the booklovers last because I felt that it was going to be very challenging, and here’s why:

      The problem with any social-media site is that you operate on the assumption that you always have something to review. Take movies, for example. On the average, the US sees over 350 minor/major releases every year, about 7 new movies per week. The average person will probably see a new movie once a month, but the enthusiast will be spoilt for choice all year round, and that’s not even counting the foreign-film crowd. From a social-media perspective, this means that a loyal user will have a reason to come back to the site all the time, because they will constantly have new content to contribute.

      Games are similar, in that there are over 500 game releases in various formats (PC, console, portables) every year. You would technically never run out of stuff to write about. Here’s the difference between movies and games though. It takes you two hours to appreciate a movie in its entirety. It takes days, with most PC or console games. The duration of consumption is vastly different between the two industries, which is why I saw very slow turnovers with gibbity relative to filmcrowd.

      Let’s take that distinction one step further: consider that it only takes about 4 minutes to appreciate a song in its entirety. Is it any wonder that your average Last.fm user has over 5,000 tracks scrobbled, which is probably more movies than the average human will watch in their entire lifetime?

      Now let’s take the reasoning in the opposite direction, with books. Where it takes the average human 2 hours to appreciate a movie and a couple days to appreciate a game, it takes over a week to appreciate a full-length book (Harry Potter fanatics notwithstanding). Most booklovers will take their time, reading several books at once. I’ve personally always got about 5 or 6 different things I read simultaneously, and the whole exercise takes me over a month to finish. What does this mean for the ye olde booklover site? Well, possibly that there will be a very marked slowdown in user-contributed content, once your users have gotten over the initial hump of building their personal bookshelf.

      Also, consider the relatively miniscule size of the collections: very few people on Shelfari will have more than a thousand books in their shelf, and those are the hardest of the hardcore. I could trounce any of these people with the number of songs in my 16gb iPod, never mind the 15,000 or so songs in my whole collection. (And I’ll bet anything that the real average site-wide would be about 3 dozen books or less, per user.)

      And that right there is the other important difference between booklovers and musiclovers. Virtual bookshelf management is friggin’ hard work. You have to type in the book title yourself, decide which of the search-results matches the item you mean, then you have to rate the book manually (and never mind writing a review for it; that’s a different level of commitment all together). In Last.fm (or I should say, AudioScrobbler), all of that is done for you; all I have to do is login and take credit. The scrobbler watches your iTunes/WMP 24/7, as you use it, automatically updating your Last.fm profile in real-time. My handful of Last.fm friends know that I’m a renewed Radiohead fanboy before I do.

      Where am I going with this meandering analysis? Nowhere, really. Just pointing out the various pitfalls that each social-review community will eventually have to face and figure out a way around. I love looking at these applications and thinking about how they work, not just from a technology standpoint, but also from the perspective of the content itself. I have no doubt in my mind that Shelfari will continue to grow its userbase over time, but I do think that the level of activity will be very challenging to keep up.

      There’s certainly something to be said for simply getting more and more new users to join up, but that results in width, not depth. You need to motivate the users in the middle — not the hardcore loyalists and not the newbs — to be constantly discussing stuff that they have a personal interest in, otherwise there’s a definite danger that the whole thing will degenerate into a glorified NYTimes Top 10 list. Case in point: can you make a guess what the most talked-about books on Shelfari are? I’ll give you a clue: 7 of them start with the initials H and P.

      Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

    • 11

      Ipod Touch: First Impressions

      7 Oct 2007

      So yeah. New ipod touch. All hail Apple.

      A little over 24 hours have passed since I bought this thing yesterday, so I think I have a sufficient amount of experience with it to put together some first-impression-type feedback.

      To say that the ipod touch is a thing of beauty is largely stating the obvious, but I figure I’m allowed one small gush: this thing is marvelously engineered. Its face is bevelled black glass and a single Home button, while the back is the traditional stainless steel surface shared by other full-sized ipods. The software is mostly identical to the iPhone, except for the fact that the iPod has much fewer applications (Safari, YouTube, Photos and the standard PIM apps are all you get), and of course it has no telephony functions. The multi-touch interface is a real wonder too — after you’ve gotten used to the idea that everything on the screen will respond to your finger tips, it becomes second-nature.

      Installation was, as always, crazy simple: Without bothering to read any documentation, I pulled the iPod out of its padded box (all black in there, as well) pressed the Home button and was promptly informed that I needed to connect it to iTunes. I popped its USB cable in, registered the device and started setting up the various sync processes.

      The main thing that you have to keep in mind with the touches is that they’ve got fairly tiny storage: just 8gb and 16gb available. This immediately ruled out syncing my whole collection across, as I have about 75gb of music stored in 3 separate devices. So setting up proper synchronization rules was going to be key: after a bit of thought I decided that I’d create a smart-playlist. (A smart-playlist is a dynamic playlist that responds to criteria set by the user. In my case, I wanted a playlist that contained only the songs that I had added within the last 90 days, any songs that were rated 4 or 5 stars, and any podcasts that hadn’t been listened to yet.) Once the list was setup, it was just a matter of pointing the iPod at it so that it would automatically sync whatever happened to be in the playlist at a given moment.

      The other consideration was how to handle videos. I watch a lot of TV shows, but they’re usually in formats that the iPod can’t handle (XviD isn’t a particularly mainstream codec), so if I wanted to watch anything on the touch, I’d have to convert the videos before copying them over. Unfortunately, this was not as easy as I thought — the main challenge being the fact that converting movies take time, and I couldn’t figure out how to properly automate the process. (My definition of automation: any video files in my "TV Shows" folder is converted to MP4, added to my iTunes library and then deleted from the folder. I found an Automator script that looked like it might solve the problem, but I honestly didn’t have time to test it out.)

      The video converter I’m currently using is iSquint, a freeware app that takes about 9-10 minutes to convert an XviD-encoded 45-minute episode to an iPod-ready MP4. (For now, I’m manually doing the conversion; my only other option would be getting all my shows from Podtropolis or ipodnova, which isn’t all that appealing.)

      Actually watching the video on the ipod proved to be a real joy: the screen isn’t the best I’ve seen, but the frame-rate is flawless and the player is very responsive when you’re seeking. Like iTunes itself, the touch remembers where you left off for each video in its library, so you can pause-and-resume your viewing at will. If you’ve ever watched a video on Quicktime or from within iTunes, there’ll be zero-learning curve here, as the controls are nearly identical.

      Of course, this being a review of a portable music device, I should probably mention that the audio quality is pretty good as well. The included headphones are an updated version of the slightly chunkier white-boxed Sennheisers that came with my 4th-gen model, but the quality seems about the same. Generally speaking, the sonic fidelity you experience is largely dependent on the kind of headphones you’re using, and the included earbuds are average at best. If you’re a mobile audiophile, replacing these with a decent pair of in-ear phones would be your first priority. (I’ve been using a pair of Shure E2C’s for the past 3 years and it looks like I might finally have an excuse to look for a replacement.)

      Coverflow works great, and the interface for browsing through your collection of "CDs" is just friggin’ brilliant. I did run into a small annoyance here though: Coverflow on the touch (and I assume, in any of the new iPods) can’t make guesses about album-art in the same way that iTunes on the desktop can. For example: I have 10 tracks from Radiohead’s album, and only one track has the cover-art embedded in it. Desktop iTunes would know that these 10 tracks belong to the same album and displays the correct cover-art even when you’re playing a track that doesn’t have it. iPod Coverflow doesn’t seem to be capable of this logical leap, and so you end up with a ton of tracks with no album art, which can be especially annoying when you’re listening in Shuffle mode. (If you’re wondering why I’m making such a big deal about the album-art … well, let’s just say that being able to flip through album covers with my fingertips was one of the main reasons why I wanted this thing so badly.)

      The other thing I didn’t really like was that there was no way to get at the volume controls as quickly as with the standard iPods (all you originally had to do was spin the wheel). Because the touch’s screen doesn’t respond to input unless it’s on, you actually have to press the Home button to "wake it up" during playback. To make matters worse, the volume controls only appear when the ipod is vertically-oriented, so you have to turn it counter-clockwise (if you were in widescreen mode), and only then would you be able to drag the volume slider.

      The mobile Safari browser is the feature I’ve spent the least amount of time with, but I did visit AJAX-enabled sites like gmail and basecamp, and couldn’t spot any show-stoppers in either of them. I also watched movie trailers on the Apple Quicktime site and was impressed to find that it plays the videos in fullscreen automatically. I also spent sometime configuring a personal start page at mockdock, which lets you collect mobile-enabled sites into a single iPhone-like interface. Fun stuff.

      Entering text such as urls or login names was a little difficult at first, as expected. The software buttons on the touch are as large or larger than the hardware buttons on most QWERTY-enabled mobiles, so it shouldn’t take me that much longer to get used to it. At a glance, the browsing experience is easily the best I’ve ever used on a palm-sized device (and I’ve had quite a few devices over the past 4 years to compare it to, believe me). It’s startling how quickly you can get used to the squeeze-and-spread gesture for zooming in and out of pages quickly; when I had to use mobile Opera on my smartphone afterwards, it was downright painful. If Apple has revolutionized anything with the iPhone and its variants, it’s definitely the mobile-browsing paradigm, and when they get around to building the multi-touch interface technology into their full-sized computers, it’ll totally change the way we use those machines as well. I’m still waiting for the time when our workstations will essentially be nothing more than one very large screen that sits in front of us at an angle like an architect’s drafting table, and has a pressure-sensitive, textured surface that’ll impart real tactile feedback; it makes me smile just thinking about it.)

      Overall, I’m quite happy with the touch. I know that it doesn’t make sense to a lot of people because of its cost and the fact that you could buy an iPhone in the US at the same price, and that’s totally fine. (My response: the iPhone isn’t available in this country yet and unlocking it is not the hassle- and risk-free experience that people are envisioning. Besides, no amount of unlocking will give it an HSDPA antenna, and that for me, is a deal-breaker.)

      The build quality is great, and considering that it’s mostly glass, it feels very solid and light. Apart from those niggling user-interface issues mentioned above, I rather like the ipod touch.

      Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments »

    • 5

      You’ve Got the (Ipod) Touch

      7 Oct 2007

      Got the ipod touch yesterday at the Power Mac Center at GB3. The 16gb model (the only one they had in stock) cost PhP21,800.00. I haven’t bought a device purely for entertainment purposes since my 4th-gen ipod photo, back in 2005, so this has made me particularly happy. I’ve only been playing with the touch for less than a day as I write this, but will write a more thorough review once I’ve had a chance to put it through its paces.

      (Transformers certainly looks very sexy on its 3.5" screen though.)

       

      Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »

     

    categories

    • Home
    • No categories

    archives

    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • August 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • July 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
    • December 2001
    • November 2001
    • October 2001

    friends

    • Dementia
    • Gabby
    • Gail
    • Gibbs
    • Helga
    • Ia
    • Ina
    • Jason
    • Kaye
    • Lauren
    • Lizz
    • Luna
    • Mae
    • Migs
    • Mike
    • Ryan
    • Sacha
    • Vicky
    • Vida
    • Yuga

    search

    notes

    Guttervomit v3 went online in January, 2008. It uses Wordpress for publishing, and was built largely with Adobe Illustrator and Textmate. Logotype and navigation is set with Interstate.