contact luis

luis is a co-founder and social software architect at Infinite.ly. he likes building small web toys a whole lot. More ...

quick links to the good stuff

  • 25 First Dates 25 May 2009
  • True Crime: Confessions of a Criminal Mastermind 17 Feb 2009
  • Finding Your Soul Mate: A Statistical Analysis 27 Jan 2009
  • Sex and Schrodinger's Cat 07 January 2009
  • An Extended Rant on Heroes 26 September 2008
  • Zero Barrier 05 May 2008
  • Sweatshop Blogging Economics 08 April 2008
  • The Doomsday Singularity 25 February 2008
  • Piracy and Its Impact on Philippine Music 21 January 2008
  • The Manila Pen-etration by the Hotelier Antonio Trillanes 29 November 2007
  • Journey of a Thousand Heroes 17 December 2006
  • Shake, Rattle & LOL 30 December 2005

@helloluis on Twitter

    elsewhere online

    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Last.FM
    • Del.icio.us
    • Flickr
    • Plurk
    • Multiply
    • Stumbleupon

    guttervomit

    • 3

      Eragon

      15 Jan 2007


      Christopher Paolini’s Inheritance Trilogy (currently “Eragon” and “Eldest”) has been keeping me company over the past few weeks and I have to say that I’ve grown pretty attached to the whole Alagaesian landscape. They’re not perfect books — or even very original — but they’re entertaining in a way that Harry Potter or other well-executed pop literature are, and make for great light reading every night before I go to bed.

      The movie though, was unbelievably horrible. Allow me to nitpick as only an Eragon fan can:

      1. No elves or dwarves.
      This isn’t a discrepancy so much as a huge-ass rewrite. The political triangle formed by the humans, elves and dwarves was a big part of what made the first book interesting, and the fact that there are no elves in the film version makes me wonder how in the world they’re going to adapt the second book (where Eragon undergoes some fairly crazy transformations). Arya, who Eragon saves from the Shade, is supposed to be an immortal Elvish princess, and the short bearded guy with the Scottish accent was supposed to be the dwarf warlord Orrik. And part of the reason why Eragon’s Dragonrider status is so controversial is that most Riders were elves, not humans. (The first Rider, also named Eragon, was Elvish, for example.)

      Now, although I think it’s atrocious that they decided to gloss over such a key element, I do have an idea of why they did it: it’s too much like Lord of the Rings for the average movie fan to swallow. With Peter Jackson’s adaptation being the high watermark for all film fantasies, it’s likely that the filmmakers wanted to avoid any direct comparisons to what is undoubtedly a better movie. (On the other hand, every major fantasy has elves and dwarves; it’s not like LotR has a patent on them.) Either that, or they just couldn’t afford Orlando Bloom/John Rhys-Davies.

      2. No John Malkovich.
      I have nothing against John Malkovich as an actor, and I do think that his scenes were decent and all. The thing is though, the evil Rider Galbatorix doesn’t actually appear in the first book. Indeed, he doesn’t appear in the second book either. He’s mentioned all the time of course, but he never actually has any scenes. The idea was to build up this evil, unseen force for a huge final confrontation, and revealing him early on considerably reduces the “unseen” part of that equation.

      3. Cruddy-looking Urgals
      To make a loose sci-fi comparison, Urgals are portrayed in the book as the Klingons of Alagaesia. The particular race of Urgals that Eragon encounters, called the Kull, are eight feet tall and built like tanks. They’re not the kind of creature that you could kill with a single swipe of your sword. The ratio, as I recall, was something like 4 human warriors to one Kull. In the movie they look like bulky Mudvayne rejects. Not exactly the most awe-inspiring (or indeed, fear-inducing) henchmen you’ll ever meet.

      4. Baby dragon all grown up now
      This is more of a stylistic peeve than anything else, but in Eragon the movie, there’s a scene where Baby Saphira takes off, undergoes a series of weird explosions and emerges a full-grown dragon. In the book, several months have passed before Saphira is bigger than her Rider. The choice to abbreviate this section of the book is actually at the heart of my biggest issue with the adaptation, which brings me to:

      5. 90 friggin’ minutes
      You know how Lord of the Rings had 2 1/2 hours running time per movie, and still had about 20 minutes of extra scenes in their respective extended editions? Eragon needed to be like that. Every epic needs to be like that. 90 minutes is just a ridiculous length to be aiming for; you’re forced to shoehorn too many sequences into too little time. 90 minutes is the length of a Disney cartoon, and even the Harry Potter movies, which were collectively a far more kid-friendly story than the Inheritance trilogy, was longer than that.

      The decision to truncate so many of the story’s key sequences — Saphira’s growth, Brom and Eragon’s journey across Alagaesia, Eragon’s pseudo-rivalry with Murtagh, the political struggles within the Varden — severely diminished what was a fairly compelling fantasy, instead reducing it to a picture book of cardboard cutouts and awkward one-liners.

      3 Responses to “Eragon”

      1. Michael 3: 16 Says:
        January 20th, 2007 at 4:03 am

        >You know how Lord of the Rings had 2 1/2 hours running time per movie, and still had about 20 minutes of extra scenes in their respective extended editions?

        Tolkien’s LotR is deemed a classic and deserved all that film wasted on multiple and deleted takes. (Actually each film in Peter Jackson’s trilogy had 30-60 minutes of extra scenes which were even pretty good though would increase the hurt on moviegoers’ asses.) I think that “well-executed pop literature” doesn’t deserve similar treatment. It should get a pop movie as well that needs not much brain power for watching. This seems to be what happened to The Da Vinci Code, though I believe the movie didn’t need to be that awful.

        Anyway I watched this movie and gave my girlfriend a running commentary on the Star Wars-esque plot and characters. That’s where I got my fun while in the theatre.

      2. Lizz Says:
        January 23rd, 2007 at 2:38 am

        When I saw Eragon, I thought it was badly-paced and frankly kind of boring. The similarities to LOTR were way too much for me to take, and if they’d added everything you mentioned from the book (racial politics, dragon riding history, etc.), I think it would have been far /less/ reminiscent of the Tolkien trilogy instead of more. With all the cuts they made, Eragon felt so much like a whiny teenager (and even the mentor character wasn’t as enjoyable to watch as it normally is)– it just felt so… rushed.

        I should definitely read the book…

      3. Qikiqtarjuaq, Nunavut Says:
        July 13th, 2007 at 3:48 pm

        M._L._Carr

        Jon Fosse Vampires Will Never Hurt You Neshkoro (town), Marquette County, WI Tlumacz Va’anoonoo C1W List of Pakistani television stations Historical anniversaries/April 15 Football World Cup 1958 Qikiqtarjuaq, Nunavut

      Leave a Reply

     

    categories

    • Home
    • Business (42)
      • Acquisitions (15)
      • Goin' Legit (61)
    • Media (53)
      • Artwork (13)
      • Books (22)
      • Comics (9)
      • Movies (142)
      • Music (102)
      • Photography (33)
      • Poker (10)
      • TV (30)
    • Randomness (301)
    • Site News (8)
    • Technology (69)
      • Games (14)
      • Hardware (113)
      • Social Software (45)
      • Software (131)
    • Tutorials (16)

    archives

    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • August 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • July 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    • February 2002
    • January 2002
    • December 2001
    • November 2001
    • October 2001

    friends

    • Dementia
    • Gabby
    • Gail
    • Gibbs
    • Helga
    • Ia
    • Ina
    • Jason
    • Kaye
    • Lauren
    • Lizz
    • Luna
    • Mae
    • Migs
    • Mike
    • Ryan
    • Sacha
    • Vicky
    • Vida
    • Yuga

    search

    notes

    Guttervomit v3 went online in January, 2008. It uses Wordpress for publishing, and was built largely with Adobe Illustrator and Textmate. Logotype and navigation is set with Interstate.